In today's era of blossoming AI tools, ChatGPT offers a wide selection of models, each with its unique advantages and applicable scenarios. However, faced with these options, many users are often confused: which model should be chosen for a specific task? How to strike a balance between performance, speed and cost? This article will unravel the mysteries of ChatGPT model selection and help you make the most informed decision.

Dissecting the ChatGPT model family: AI assistants with their own strengths
Let's start by understanding the main models offered by ChatGPT and their core features:
Model name | core positioning | Main features | Scenario |
---|---|---|---|
GPT-4o | All-in-one real-time multimodal assistant | Supports almost all input formats, fast response time and good interactive experience | Minutes, project collaboration, cross-media creation |
GPT-4.5 | Creative and Emotional Expression Specialist | High emotional intelligence, natural tone, imaginative | Brand storytelling, user communication, creative content |
o4-mini | Efficient technical assistant | Fast, low cost and suitable for frequent calls | Simple scripting, data handling, quick queries |
o4-mini-high | Precision Technology Parser | More accurate than mini for complex problems | Algorithm derivation, system architecture, technical difficulties |
o3 | Strategic Analysis and Complex Reasoning Engine | Specializes in multi-step reasoning and interdisciplinary analysis | Market strategy, financial forecasting, complex decision making |
o1-pro | Robust conservative model | Answer cautiously and with low tolerance for error | Compliance reports, policy analysis, high-precision outputs |
Each model has its own unique "personality" and specialty, just like different tools in a toolbox, choosing the right model can be half the battle.
ChatGPT Model Functional Comparison Table
Below is a detailed comparison of the scores for each model in terms of different features:
Functions/Features | GPT-4o | GPT-4.5 | o4-mini | o4-mini-high | o3 | o1-pro |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
reaction speed | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ |
multimodal capability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ |
Creativity and Expression | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
coding skills | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
logical inference | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
precision | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
utilization cost | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐: Excellent | ⭐⭐⭐⭐: Superior | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐: Basic
Note: Higher cost-of-use ratings indicate lower costs (better value for money).
Task matching guide: selecting the best model for different needs
Depending on the nature of the task, we can be more targeted in choosing the right model:
Text processing tasks
For day-to-day document comprehension, summarization, and content creation:
- Short generic content: Priority is given to GPT-4o, which is fast and full-featured
- Emotionally rich creative writing: GPT-4.5 provides a more "human" expression.
- Batch processing of large numbers of documents: o4-mini provides better cost-effectiveness
- Need for highly accurate text analysis: consider o1-pro for the most prudent answer
Programming and Technical Support
In code-related tasks:
- Daily debugging and simple scripting: o4-mini is responsive and affordable
- Complex Algorithms and System Design: o4-mini-high provides more in-depth technical analysis
- Cross-platform architecture and technology research: o3 can provide more comprehensive technical insights
- Critical production system code review: o1-pro is more reliable in high-risk scenarios
Comparison Table of Common Tasks and Recommendation Models
The following table helps you quickly find the best model choice for a particular task:
Type of mission | best option | second best option | not recommended |
---|---|---|---|
Minutes generation | GPT-4o | GPT-4.5 | o1-pro |
Social Media Copywriting | GPT-4.5 | GPT-4o | o4-mini |
Data analysis scripts | o4-mini | o4-mini-high | GPT-4.5 |
System Architecture Design | o4-mini-high | o3 | o4-mini |
market strategy planning | o3 | GPT-4o | o4-mini |
Compliance file review | o1-pro | o3 | o4-mini |
Multimedia content creation | GPT-4o | GPT-4.5 | o4-mini |
complex mathematical problem | o4-mini-high | o3 | GPT-4.5 |
Real-time collaborative projects | GPT-4o | GPT-4.5 | o1-pro |
Brand Story Writing | GPT-4.5 | GPT-4o | o1-pro |
Mathematics and analytical tasks
In dealing with numerical calculations and data analysis:
- Basic math.: o4-mini is fully competent
- Complex formulas and proofs: o4-mini-high can provide a more rigorous derivation of the
- Multidimensional data analysis: o3 performs better when dealing with cross-domain data
- Financial modeling and risk assessment: o1-pro is more conservative and robust in high-risk analysis
multimodal task
For tasks involving images, documents, and speech:
- Real-time image analysis and PDF processing: GPT-4o provides an optimal multimodal experience
- Creative Image Description and Storytelling: GPT-4.5 can give a more emotional interpretation
- Simple image analysis and information extraction: o4-mini still practical for basic recognition tasks
- Complex Visual Analysis and Research: Consider o3 for deeper multimedia understanding
Intelligent model selection strategies: a three-step approach
Want to choose the right model quickly and efficiently? Here's a simple three-step strategy:
Step 1: Assessing task complexity
First determine which category your task falls into:
- Daily single-step tasks or multimedia processing: Selection of GPT-4o
- Emotionally rich creative content: GPT-4.5 preferred
- High Frequency Technical Problems and Base Codes: o4-mini or mini-high fits well
- Requires deep reasoning and multi-step analysis: o3 or o1-pro is more appropriate.
Step 2: Consider economic factors
Choose based on frequency of use and budget:
- Batch automated processing: o4-mini provides optimal cost-effectiveness
- Cyclical Creative Projects: Note the use limits for GPT-4.5.
- All-weather high-frequency use: GPT-4o strikes a good balance between performance and cost
- One-time critical items: may wish to invest in o3 or o1-pro for best quality
Step 3: Progressive Model Upgrade
Adopt a flexible upgrade strategy:
- First try an economical model like o4-mini
- If the results are not satisfactory, upgrade to mini-high
- A more in-depth analysis is still needed and may be considered o3
- For high-risk decisions, o1-pro can eventually be used
Model Selection Decision Flow Chart
Demand characteristics | call frequency | Risk tolerance | recommendation model | Options |
---|---|---|---|---|
Real-time interaction, multiple media | your (honorific) | center | GPT-4o | o4-mini |
Real-time interaction, multiple media | lower (one's head) | center | GPT-4o | GPT-4.5 |
Creative expression, brand language | center | your (honorific) | GPT-4.5 | GPT-4o |
Creative expression, brand language | lower (one's head) | lower (one's head) | GPT-4.5 | o1-pro |
Code and Technical Issues | your (honorific) | your (honorific) | o4-mini | o4-mini-high |
Code and Technical Issues | center | lower (one's head) | o4-mini-high | o3 |
Complex data analysis | lower (one's head) | center | o3 | o4-mini-high |
Complex data analysis | lower (one's head) | lower (one's head) | o1-pro | o3 |
Automated Script Batch Processing | your (honorific) | center | o4-mini | GPT-4o |
Key decision support | lower (one's head) | lower (one's head) | o1-pro | o3 |
Common Misconceptions and Best Practices
When using the ChatGPT model, many users often fall into some misconceptions, let's clarify these concepts:
1. "The more advanced the model, the better it must be"
In fact, model selection should be based on specific tasks. For example, using GPT-4.5 to process a large number of simple scripts may be less efficient due to rate limitation, in which case o4-mini is a better choice instead.
2. "The mini-series can only handle simple tasks."
Don't underestimate the capabilities of the mini series! o4-mini-high is excellent at handling complex math problems and code analysis, it just may not be handled in the same way as other models.
3. "Cost is the only consideration"
In addition to the cost of API calls, the cost of time should be considered. For example, o1-pro, while accurate, requires longer thinking time and is not suitable for urgent tasks.
4. "All models support the same input types"
Not really! The mini series does not support audio and video inputs, so if you need to handle this type of content, you should choose the GPT-4o or GPT-4.5.
5. "One model for all tasks"
The best practice is to use a combination of different models: for example, GPT-4o for initial ideas, o4-mini to process the base code, o3 for in-depth analysis, and finally GPT-4.5 to optimize the presentation of the output.
Conclusion: Choosing the right tool doubles the effect and halves the effort
Choosing a ChatGPT model is like choosing the right tool - you need to make a decision based on the size of the "screws" (task complexity), the number of them (frequency of calls), and your requirements for the tool (cost and risk tolerance).
By correctly matching the model to the task, you can find the optimal balance between speed, quality and cost:
- Multi-modal interaction and real-time collaboration, choosingGPT-4o
- Creative writing and brand expression usingGPT-4.5
- High-frequency technical problems with simple scripts that rely on theo4-mini
- Complex algorithms and precise calculations, upgraded too4-mini-high
- Strategic decision-making and multi-step analysis usingo3
- High-risk scenarios and strict compliance requirements, trusto1-pro
Armed with these selection strategies, you'll be able to navigate the power of ChatGPT with greater ease, making AI a truly powerful aid in boosting productivity. Hopefully, this guide will help you stop hesitating the next time you're faced with a model to choose from, and instead you'll be able to quickly find the one that best suits your needs!
If you want to use GPT Plus, Claude Pro, Grok Super official paid exclusive account, you can contact our professional team (wx: abch891) if you don't know how to recharge yourself.